|
|
12/26/05
To Be More Clear
I have said things and written articles that I believe have been
misunderstood. I want to reiterate my thoughts in hopefully a clearer
venue. The first point is to realize that I am from the Academic
University School of Ceramic Art. Studying in the 60�s in the Midwest
was a wonderful experience. The Contemporary Ceramic Art movement was
really just getting started and there was incredible activity. Each
state had their Craft Council and each state had their representative to
the American Craft Council in New York City. There were new programs,
new teachers, new workshop leaders, new shows both invitational and
juried, and everyone was trying to learn more.
Even in the 60�s the schools and students were trying to follow Peter
Volkous� lead with Abstract Expressionistic clay. There were those of us
who were totally taken by the art of the potter and a few of us even
wanted to be potters. But in America in the mid 60�s where would one go
to learn to become a potter? Few of us could go overseas to apprentice
with Leach or a Mashiko potter. We were not told about the southeastern
folk potters who had somehow struggled through the depression and the
40�s and 50�s and were still making pots the same way their ancestors
had. So we were left with the option of studying in the University
system with teachers who were great teachers, but none that I can
remember were potters. Thinking back surely Peter Volkous had been a
potter at the Bray; as had Ken Ferguson; but that�s all I can think of
that had a real potter�s experience. Peter Volkous made some of the
greatest pots the 20th century had ever seen before he followed the New
York painters into Ab-Ex Clay. He totally understood the art of the
potter. Sure there were others who journeyed to England and Japan, but
they never worked fulltime, or made their living as a potter. I have
stated before and will again, our teachers were not potters, but they
were incredible teachers. The great teacher sees the spark and nourishes
the flame. I wouldn�t be the potter I am if it weren�t for my high
school teacher Mr. Joe Corsello. Once Mr. Corsello helped steer me into
college, then Mr. Jim Wozniak took over and helped me learn all that I
could learn with the situation we had at Illinois State University. Woz,
as we affectionately knew him by, brought the best teachers to us for
workshops and brought the best work to us through a national
invitational craft show.
Through the 70�s, 80�s, and 90�s the emphasis at the University was away
from crafts towards sculptural clay and on into installations and
conceptual �Art�. The only problem I have with that is that pottery was
looked down upon and in many cases removed from the curriculum; not
always in writing, but surely in practice. As I have mentioned before,
wheels were thrown out, sold, moved into the corner, or allowed to be
played with one semester before moving on the serious sculpture. You can
blame funding, but it was more attitude than funding.
If people know anything about me, they should understand that I have
dedicated my life to �The Art of the Potter� and certainly I would like
to see pottery taught in the Universities at the same level as
sculpture. Let�s be honest here too and admit that many Ceramic Art
teachers know very little about �The Art of the Potter� due to their
interest in sculpture, but yet have to teach pottery. How is that done?
Poorly at best. So yes, I am disappointed with the state of pottery in
the art world and our society in general. But then if we are not
educated in our homes and schools, where do you expect that to come
from?
I have been in Ceramic Art for 44 years now and I have studied it,
practiced it, taught it, documented it, ate it, slept it, and observed
it. I would like nothing better than to see The Art of the Potter
understood, appreciated, and supported in the United States, but I do
not. So my comments are not that I do not want it taught, my comments
are that since it is not being taught as it should be, then where do we
turn to get back on the right road? I understand that art is the first
to be cut from school funding, but if we are to pass on our knowledge,
then we have to get ceramic art education back into the schools,
starting at kindergarten. I would like to see the Universities reinstate
pottery of the highest level back into their programs and taught by the
most competent teachers available.
Aside from the tea ceremony, why is pottery the highest art form in
Japan? Why do North Carolinians stand in line to buy pots at potter�s
sales? WHY, because they grew up with crafts all around them and it was
appreciated and respected. The bond to the crafts has never been severed
and it�s part of their lives.
|